Re: Derivations (SD)
- From: "1st Semester Logic Student" <jzarwel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jun 2005 23:16:15 -0700
Hey Jeff,
Thanks man. That first one was the one I was worried most about. On
this one:
d. {A -> B, B -> C, ~C} |- ~A
Couldn't A be derived from A -> B with horseshoe elimination and then
just slap the tilde on the A with negation introduction? I think I'm
missing something here. It looks like they have a sub derivation on the
homepage with the rules. Would I need to do anything with the second
and third formulas above? Seems like I would. I'm missing something
here.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Derivations (SD)
- From: Jeffrey Ketland
- Re: Derivations (SD)
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Derivations (SD)
- References:
- Derivations (SD)
- From: 1st Semester Logic Student
- Re: Derivations (SD)
- From: Jeffrey Ketland
- Derivations (SD)
- Prev by Date: About countable Ordinals.
- Next by Date: Re: Fun Times With SL
- Previous by thread: Re: Derivations (SD)
- Next by thread: Re: Derivations (SD)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|