Re: Logic in Schools
- From: "George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Jul 2005 06:15:13 -0700
Keith Ramsay wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the two of you are just phenomenally
> biased against Torkel Franzen:
snip
> There is no "obligatory hazing". I've been reading usenet for
> a very long time, and I've been criticized in a lot of different
> ways. People pointing out as incorrect things that I've written
> that were incorrect are some of my favorite critics.
Oh, really? Then let me point out that you made an error in a truth
table a month or so ago.
I'll be more than happy to continue pointing that out, in reply to any
other messages you make to sci.logic, for years if you like.
Please give me some idea of how many years, and how many posts, it
might take me to achieve 'favorite critic' status with you.
snip
.
- References:
- Re: Logic in Schools
- From: George Dance
- Re: Logic in Schools
- From: Acme Diagnostics
- Re: Logic in Schools
- From: George Dance
- Re: Logic in Schools
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: Logic in Schools
- Prev by Date: Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- Next by Date: Logic in Schools
- Previous by thread: Re: Logic in Schools
- Next by thread: Re: Logic in Schools
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
