Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?



Tom wrote:
>
> Mr Elliot, I agree. Now, please, would you be kind enough as to care to
> give me an example of a relation which is not spatial. IOW, are all
> relations spatial? I think so. But I will not assume that on my own. It
> is far far too serious.
>
> Thank you.
> Tom

Sequentiality, as denoted by the successor relation, is a ordinarily
thought of as a property of time, not space. With great trepidation I
ask - why is this so serious?

.

Relevant Pages