Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: "Tom" <tkorna@xxxxx>
- Date: 16 Jul 2005 02:40:18 -0700
Babylonian wrote:
> Sequentiality, as denoted by the successor relation, is a ordinarily
> thought of as a property of time, not space.
But some guy once said that the universe is a timeless manifold, his
name was ... no, I will not recall. E.. something.
> With great trepidation I
> ask - why is this so serious?
Look where it gets you:
I show how Plato's theory, as it applies to mathematical objects, is
essentially a primitve version of modern recursion theory, which has
all the essential elements of the ancient theory.
http://home.ican.net/~arandall/Plato/
We believe that metaphysics should strive for no less than mathematics.
http://mally.stanford.edu/computation.pdf
Thank you for writing.
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Babylonian
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- References:
- Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Babylonian
- Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- Prev by Date: Being and Nothing
- Next by Date: Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- Previous by thread: Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- Next by thread: Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- Index(es):