Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Robert Low <mtx014@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:05:16 +0100
Chris Menzel wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:32:19 +0100, Robert Low <mtx014@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:Chris Menzel wrote:Same place the nonstandard models of first-order PA live. :-)Hence, so interpreted, second-order PA has nonstandard models.So where do they live?
OK: I was wondering if you had to have some weird non-standard universe for the model theory to be in.
Thanks for the explanation. .
- References:
- Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Babylonian
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Babylonian
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Tom
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Babylonian
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Robert Low
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Robert Low
- Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- From: Chris Menzel
- Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- Prev by Date: Re: What isn't a tautology?
- Next by Date: Re: Being and Nothing
- Previous by thread: Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- Next by thread: Re: Turing completeness of the functional paradigm?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|