Re: "Friendly Premises"




Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"Acme Diagnostics" <LFinezapthis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> There is no concept of "self-proving procedure" or "recursive
>>>proof" in logic.
>>
>> That statement is incorrect.
>
> OK, so you've invented them.

I invented nothing. You said, "There is no concept of
'self-proving procedure' or 'recursive proof' in logic." I
replied, "That statement is incorrect."

That's what is known as a call, i.e. I clearly called your
attention to a statement which I claim to contain a logic error.
You've had all the time you needed to review it.

The correct response was either 1) No, my statement is
correct, or 2) Yes, I made a logic error."

The response "Ok, so you've invented them" is an incorrect
response. It is plainly a weasel response. It says nothing.

Why should I now give you another time slice to correct this
second logic mistake? But ok. Go ahead. You probably are
totally oblivious to the fact that we're conducting logic here
anyway. No equal signs. Ok, special allowance for lightweight
beginners. Take all the time you need. Again.

>What I'm wondering is, what do you
>take them to mean?

Yeah, I'd want to change the subject too. Lots of names for that.

1 or 2, Torkel.

I bet I've pointed out 10 of your logic errors, and certainly at
least 5, yet you have not acknowledged even one of them. I'm
through wasting my good time trying to teach you logic without
any cooperation whatsoever from you.

Larry

p.s. Hope I didn't overdo it! Hehe. Me? Never!
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Five questions feared by men
    ... How I would spend the insurance money if you died. ... Perhaps the best response to this question was offered by Al Bundy, ... the proper response is an emphatic: ... Incorrect responses include: ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: MSI 3.1 v2 doesnt update MSI.DLL from MSI 2.0
    ... >> One that points out an incorrect reply. ... >> nothing to do with the OPs problem. ... then just post it and forget the finger pointing. ... in pointing out the uselessness on Carey's response. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: linking C++ functions in a C program
    ... James Kuyper writes: ... it as a response to the message in which he actually wrote it, ... incorrect things about C/C++ linking, ... | Neither theory nor practice are on your side. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Getting a response from a WebRequest with an exception?
    ... details are incorrect. ... However, the web site ... WebRequest.GetResponse has already thrown, ... Is there a way to access the response even if an exception has been ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Stochastic Queries
    ... Upon further review, I am incorrect. ... My criticism of Joe's response stands, ...
    (comp.databases.theory)