Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 Aug 2005 15:06:37 +0200
"George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Apparently; which makes the assertion in question equivalent to:
> There is no concept of "proof" in logic.
Why would you make this bold assertion?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- References:
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Jesse Alama
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Acme Diagnostics
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Next by Date: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Next by thread: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Index(es):