Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 Aug 2005 15:43:55 +0200
"George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Surely not. I am pointing out that, if Mr. Shobe is correct that the
> concepts of 'self-proving procedure' and 'proof' refer to the same
> things, then asserting (as you did) "There is no concept of
> 'self-proving procedure' in logic" is equivalent to asserting "There is
> no concept of 'proof' in logic."
No, I think you're really eagerly affirming that there is no such
thing as proof in logic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- References:
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Jesse Alama
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Acme Diagnostics
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Next by Date: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Next by thread: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading