Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: "George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Aug 2005 07:54:19 -0700
Torkel Franzen wrote:
> "George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Perhaps you could point it out?
>
> Consider it an exercise in intensional logic.
Aha. So let's remove the intensionality:
<unsnip>
> > I am pointing out that, if Mr. Shobe is correct that the
> > concepts of 'self-proving procedure' and 'proof' refer to the same
> > things, then "There is no concept of
> > 'self-proving procedure' in logic" is equivalent to "There is
> > no concept of 'proof' in logic."
</us>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- References:
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Jesse Alama
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Acme Diagnostics
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Next by Date: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Next by thread: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|