Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: "George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Aug 2005 08:50:12 -0700
George Dance wrote:
> H. J. Sander Bruggink wrote:
> > I am pointing that, if the words 'bloem' and 'flower'
> > refer to the same things, then asserting "there is no
> > word 'bloem' in English" is equivalent to asserting
> > "there is no word 'flower' in English."
> >
> > Do you agree with this? :-)
>
> Well, yes, but [...]
Oops! Should have been, "Well, no, but..."
Once again we see the apparent power of writing to confuse and bewilder
my kind.
we weren't talking about words but concepts. The fact
> that an English-speaker doesn't use the word 'bloem' does not show that
> English-speakers have no such concept. In fact they do, even though
> they use a different word ('flower') for it.
.
- References:
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Jesse Alama
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Acme Diagnostics
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- From: George Dance
- Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Next by Date: Re: Polish foundations?
- Previous by thread: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Next by thread: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading