Re: Constructive Math query.
- From: "david petry" <david_lawrence_petry@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Aug 2005 12:44:16 -0700
Torkel Franzen wrote:
> "david petry" <david_lawrence_petry@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>
> > Yes, but "the fact that it is one" can only be established by proof.
>
> Consider a statement of the form
>
> For every partial recursive function f, if f is total, then ---f---.
>
> Do you agree that this is not constructively synonymous with "For
> every partial recursive function f, if we can prove that f is total,
> then ---f---"?
I would argue that "if f is total" is not a constructively valid
phrase.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Constructive Math query.
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Constructive Math query.
- References:
- Constructive Math query.
- From: Bill Taylor
- Re: Constructive Math query.
- From: david petry
- Re: Constructive Math query.
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: Constructive Math query.
- From: david petry
- Re: Constructive Math query.
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Constructive Math query.
- Prev by Date: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Next by Date: Re: "Friendly Premises"
- Previous by thread: Re: Constructive Math query.
- Next by thread: Re: Constructive Math query.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|