Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 01 Sep 2005 09:22:05 +0200
"galathaea" <galathaea@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> ** Can you specify one particular theorem which you interpret as being
>> close to stating that an arithmetical sentence is intuitionistically
>> true if and only if it has a proof in S, for some formal system S? **
>>
>>
>>
>> theorem 9.9
Theorem 9.9 is a characterization of the formulas provable in
intuitionistic propositional logic. It doesn't even have the
appearance of saying anything about arithmetical truth.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- From: galathaea
- Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- References:
- Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- From: galathaea
- Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- From: galathaea
- Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- From: galathaea
- Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- Prev by Date: Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- Next by Date: Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- Previous by thread: Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- Next by thread: Re: ?? truth as provability ??
- Index(es):