Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: "futurist" <adamgolding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Sep 2005 11:41:04 -0700
OH i get it! constructive reductio ADDS (introduces) a tilde, and IP
removes (eliminates) one. they are only equally powerful if you have
DN (double negation).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: William Elliot
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- References:
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: adamgolding
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- Prev by Date: Re: unconventional A and E
- Next by Date: Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- Previous by thread: Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- Next by thread: Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|