Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 18:15:08 -0700
I've no idea to whom your addressing your reply nor what you're talking
about. Removal of references often means that I don't notice a reply to
me. Removal of essential context often means no well thought reply.
I've not the time nor the inclination for the clerical
chore of back tracking the thread to reconstruct the
line of thought. If you want intelligent and well thought
answers, then include the context pertinent to your reply
and to whom your are talking.
Please learn and use better math group manners as demonstrated
by other participants of this newsgroup and as described at
http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm#quote
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, futurist wrote:
> OH i get it! constructive reductio ADDS (introduces) a tilde, and IP
> removes (eliminates) one. they are only equally powerful if you have
> DN (double negation).
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- References:
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: adamgolding
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- From: futurist
- Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- Prev by Date: Re: A proof for !(p^q) |- !p v !q
- Next by Date: Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- Previous by thread: Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- Next by thread: Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|