Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: Darko Aleksic <adarko@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 05:13:20 GMT
On 7 Sep 2005 00:10:53 GMT, Chris Menzel
<cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:28:51 GMT, Darko Aleksic <adarko@xxxxxxx> said:
>> On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:24:24 GMT, ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (David C.
>> Ullrich) wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 15:59:36 GMT, Darko Aleksic <adarko@xxxxxxx>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>><snippity snip>
>>>>
>>>>Sounds like a TO with a tenure to me.
>>>
>>>Uh, no doubt. What's a "TO"?
>>
>> Tony Orlow (some confused guy from sci.math that you had a chance to
>> 'meet'). And I meant that Slater is TO with a tenure, not you, sorry
>> if it came across differently.
>
>His views on the philosophy of mathematics might not be mainstream, but
>I assure you Slater is no Orlowian crank. He is an accomplished
>philosophical logician and in particular an expert on Hilbert's epsilon
>calculus.
My appologies to prof. Slater, then.
Darko
.
- References:
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: slaterbh
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: Darko Aleksic
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: David C. Ullrich
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: Darko Aleksic
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- Prev by Date: Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
- Next by Date: :: inaccessibility via barb ::
- Previous by thread: Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- Next by thread: Re: Anti-diagonalist page
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|