Re: A Brief Note on Notation

From: Robert Low <mtx014@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 09:10:15 +0100

Jim Spriggs wrote:

He uses "ln" for the natural logarithm.  Nowhere does he need or use
logarithms base 10.  Which mathematician, nowadays, does need logarithms
base 10?


How else do you expect the children to learn to multiply, if
you take away their log tables?

References:
- A Brief Note on Notation
  - From: George Dance
- Re: A Brief Note on Notation
  - From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: A Brief Note on Notation
  - From: Robert Low
- Re: A Brief Note on Notation
  - From: Jim Spriggs

Prev by Date: Re: A Brief Note on Notation
Next by Date: Re: reductio ad falsum versus reductio ad absurdum
Previous by thread: Re: A Brief Note on Notation
Next by thread: Re: A Brief Note on Notation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread