Re: Goedel's undecidable G



Kazimierz Kurz wrote:
>
> Jim Spriggs napisal:
> > LordBeotian wrote:
> >> I want to see the explicit expression of G in the language of PA, is there
> >> any web page where I can take a look to G?
> > No, is my guess, because G will be _very_ complicated when expressed in
> > the language of PA. Before saying more, I must admit to my ignorance
> > about what the language of PA is. Does it just have a constant for zero
> > and a function symbol for successor, or does it also have function
> > symbols for addition and multiplication?
> If formal theory has not multiplication there is no Goedel sentence
> construction for it.
>
> > To express G a long sequence of definitions is used and the G that
> > results is _not_ in the language of PA.
> You are wrong! Of course, and this is the clue, Goedel sentence
> is a senntence of PA annd it is just ordinary theorem about natural
> numbers! But simultaneously it may be interpreted as sentence about
> itself...

While looking for something else, I came across Peano's "Arithmetices
principia, nova methodo exposita" in English translation. It is quite
clear that the only non-logical constants are: number, one, successor,
is equal to. He introduces addition and multiplication by recursive
definitions though he fails to prove that "+" and "x" are eliminable
(and thereby breaks his own rule for definitions). The paper is
reproduced in van Heijenoort's Source Book.

--
I don't know who you are Sir, or where you come from,
but you've done me a power of good.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Goedels undecidable G
    ... >> I want to see the explicit expression of G in the language of PA, ... > and a function symbol for successor, or does it also have function ... If formal theory has not multiplication there is no Goedel sentence ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Goedels undecidable G
    ... >>> I want to see the explicit expression of G in the language of PA, ... >> and a function symbol for successor, or does it also have function ... Of course, and this is the clue, Goedel sentence ... not the sort of thing that Lord Beotian will find written down anywhere. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: _Verum Et Factum Convertuntur_ (or: Surprised By Syntax)
    ... >> Notice that my quotation stated that Ebonics IS a language, ... >Mathematics, statistics and science do indeed deal with precise concepts ... successor, and having the property that if a set has an element ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Presburger arithmetic proves godels incompleteness theorem w
    ... The first-order language of arithmetic is defined to be a first-order ... and binary function symbols + and *. ... unary function symbol S, ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+1/7
    ... clear meaning while "applying the successor function an infinite ... successor" into the language of set theory. ...
    (sci.math)