Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Sep 2005 03:27:24 GMT
On 25 Sep 2005 09:31:01 -0700, William of Ockham
> The asterixes are there from my last posting. The predicament is NOT
> that some statement is true in one model and false in another. It is
> how we, from our point of view, can state the relativistic statement
> "S is true in one model and false in another" in a language whose
> model is the one in which S is true (S being the statement that P(w)
> is uncountable).
You seem to be getting off track here. The "paradox" has to do with the
fact that S can be *true* in models that are in fact countable, not that
it's true in some models and false in others.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- References:
- Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Moore's account of Skolem's Paradox
- Next by Date: all the good books are OOP
- Previous by thread: Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Index(es):