Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 02:49:00 GMT
On 28 Sep 2005 00:03:14 GMT, Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
said:
>> If by contrast the difference in extension is not in principle
>> demonstrable, then the two terms (surely) have the same meaning. Yet
>> this is what Skolem's theorem seems to deny.
>
> What is "Skolem's theorem"?
I guess you meant the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem. It's just that it so
obviously doesn't deny what you say it seems to deny that it didn't
occur to me that that is what you meant.
.
- References:
- Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: all the good books are OOP
- Next by Date: Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|