Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:46:07 +0300
William of Ockham wrote:
If by contrast the difference in extension is not in principle
demonstrable, then the two terms (surely) have the same meaning.
So the terms "the set of all quadruplets of naturals x,y,z,n with n>2 such that x^n + y^n = z^n" and "the empty set" have the same meaning?
-- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- References:
- Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- From: William of Ockham
- Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Next by Date: Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|