Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox

"William of Ockham" <d3uckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Then change it to, the model that set theory has, when its sentences
> express the propositions they ordinarily express, is not countable.

I don't think we could profitably attempt to unravel this. Don't you
just mean to say that the set of real numbers, or the power set of N,
is uncountable?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Moore on Skolems Paradox
    ... >> Then change it to, the model that set theory has, when its sentences ... >> express the propositions they ordinarily express, ... > just mean to say that the set of real numbers, or the power set of N, ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Moore on Skolems Paradox
    ... Well, then I can only observe that "the model that set theory has, ... when its sentences express the propositions they ordinarily express" ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
    ... inconsistency of set theory. ... Theorem proves there is no enumeration and no enumeration proves ... And the uncountablity of the power set of omega can ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory
    ... >> set and its power set SIMULTANEOUSLY. ... some language despite the fact that language has obvious shortcomings ... This is why it is peculiarly prone to paradox. ... > The power set is a common concept in set theory. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: What proof is there that 1 is any different from [0]?
    ... power set of any two sets. ... What I don't get about modern set theory is that it bases itself on ... you get a unique set, despite the fact that infinity plus one is also ...
    (sci.math)