Re: Moore on Skolem's Paradox




I said:
> What we call "learning a
>language" is assigning a reference to all of the terms that we learn.
>So we learn that "hamburgers" mean hamburgers, "Socrates" means
>Socrates, "two"means the number two, and so on. An interpretation (as
>I understand) is the information which we must have about a sentence in
>order to understand it.
>So by "set theory as expressed in some language *English" I mean the
>language+ the interpretation given to it as a part of learning the
>language itself.'
>An interpretation is "An allocation of significance to the terms of a
>purely formal system, by specifying ranges for the variables,
>denotations for the individual constants &c".

I'm sorry, I can't see anywhere here where I said that "x" means two.
Obviously learning a language means learning how quantifiers like
"all", "some", "any", "no" &c are used. This obviously does not mean
"assigning a reference". Quite the opposite. That's why the
traditional logicians called the quantifiers "syncategoremata" -
co-signifying words, words which do not have a meaning in their own
right, but which qualify the meaning of other words. I thought that
was too obvious to mention.

Perhaps I should not have said "all of the terms that we learn". If
that caused the confusion, sorry.

Except, qualifying this apology, a quantifier is not strictly speaking
a "term".

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Reason for Set keyword
    ... assigning to a reference whereas assignment to primitives is done ... VB, IMO, is a very easy language ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: C Programming
    ... The above is a good reference book but not one for learning to program in C. ... and explains the C language better than any other book I've ... Try learning to program in Python from the Python Language Reference ... If you are trying to teach C and basic programming concepts at the same ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: why the perl documents is hard to understand?
    ... > I am learning Perl now. ... > important tool for learning a language is to learn how to read its help ... That's because you are reading a reference manual, ...
    (comp.lang.perl.misc)
  • Re: C Programming
    ... The above is a good reference book but not one for learning to program in C. ... and explains the C language better than any other book I've ... Try learning to program in Python from the Python Language Reference ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: C Programming
    ... The above is a good reference book but not one for learning to program in C. ... and explains the C language better than any other book I've ... Try learning to program in Python from the Python Language Reference ...
    (Fedora)