Re: Why are rules of inference not laws of sentential calculus?
- From: Jim Spriggs <jim.sprigs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 04:06:19 +0000 (UTC)
Jim Spriggs wrote:
>
> .... Gentzen's paper was translated in (two
> numbers of) the American Philosophical Quarterly. Precise reference
> somebody? It's also translated in
>
> Gentzen, G; ed Szabo, M E "Collected Papers" North-Holland
Elsewhere in the thread Frege supplied the precise reference:
Gentzen, G., [1934] "Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen,"
Mathematische Zeitschrift 39, pp. 176-210 and 405-431; Eng.
tr. "Investigations into logical deduction," American Philosophical
Quarterly, Vol. I (1964), pp. 288-306 and, Vol. II (1965), pp. 204-218.
--
I don't know who you are Sir, or where you come from,
but you've done me a power of good.
.
- References:
- Why are rules of inference not laws of sentential calculus?
- From: andrewspencers
- Re: Why are rules of inference not laws of sentential calculus?
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Why are rules of inference not laws of sentential calculus?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are rules of inference not laws of sentential calculus?
- Next by Date: Re: Some questions on logic
- Previous by thread: Re: Why are rules of inference not laws of sentential calculus?
- Next by thread: Re: Why are rules of inference not laws of sentential calculus?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
