Re: Skolem Again
- From: "William of Ockham" <d3uckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Oct 2005 10:43:06 -0700
David C. Ullrich wrote:
> let's just say the meaning of a
> theory is something which is determined by the class of models
> of a theory, leaving open what the meaning actually _is_.)
> [So]in fact it's very clear that there is simply no contradiction: The fact
> that one theory has more than one model does not say
> that it has more than one meaning - if T is a theory
> there is exactly _one_ thing which is the class of all models of T.
Well if that's your definition of 'meaning', of course there is no
contradiction. But meaning = truth conditions. Truth conditions =
model.
> If you read that sentence you may understand my confusion
Typo.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Skolem Again
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Skolem Again
- From: Rupert
- Re: Skolem Again
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Skolem Again
- From: george
- Re: Skolem Again
- References:
- Skolem Again
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Skolem Again
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Skolem Again
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Skolem Again
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Skolem Again
- From: William of Ockham
- Skolem Again
- Prev by Date: Re: Skolem Again
- Next by Date: Re: Skolem Again
- Previous by thread: Re: Skolem Again
- Next by thread: Re: Skolem Again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|