sci.logic

Thread Index

Re: Help writing a paper on Godel's Incompleteness Thorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
stuck up in one simple problem
- From: chander.prb@xxxxxxxxx
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Help writing a paper on Godel's Incompleteness Thorem
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Turing and Godel
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Turing and Godel
- From: Mark-T
Re: Help writing a paper on Godel's Incompleteness Thorem
- From: Scott
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Help writing a paper on Godel's Incompleteness Thorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: analytic function... need help.
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: William Elliot
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: Help writing a paper on Godel's Incompleteness Thorem
- From: Bhartrhari
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help writing a paper on Godel's Incompleteness Thorem
- From: logic-lurker
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
Re: minimal element iff maximal element: how to prove?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
Help writing a paper on Godel's Incompleteness Thorem
- From: Scott
Re: analytic function... need help.
- From: Lee Rudolph
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: analytic function... need help.
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
Re: minimal element iff maximal element: how to prove?
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
minimal element iff maximal element: how to prove?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
**theory-edge** mailing list
- From: vznuri
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: George Dance
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: analytic function... need help.
- From: Lee Rudolph
Einstein's 'dark energy".
- From: caesarjbsquitti
Re: analytic function... need help.
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Stephen Harris
Are Logicians Naturally Logical?
- From: William Elliot
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: analytic function... need help.
- From: curtispro
Re: analytic function... need help.
- From: curtispro
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: conditional statement v.s. conditional probability?
- From: Miler
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
- From: nobody40
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: analytic function... need help.
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: analytic function... need help.
- From: Pierre Asselin
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: conditional statement v.s. conditional probability?
- From: david petry
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
analytic function... need help.
- From: curtispro
UCLA Logic Colloquium, Dec 2
- From: H. Enderton
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: conditional statement v.s. conditional probability?
- From: Barb Knox
conditional statement v.s. conditional probability?
- From: littlebeam
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: paul_bostonjp
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: G . Frege
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: george
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: george
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Robert Low
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Robert Low
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Robert Low
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Robert Low
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: =
- From: george
Re: question about categoricity
- From: george
Re: complete theory of Rationals
- From: m s
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
Re: complete theory of Rationals
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: complete theory of Rationals
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: complete theory of Rationals
- From: William Elliot
Re: complete theory of Rationals
- From: m s
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: G . Frege
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: G . Frege
Re: complete theory of Rationals
- From: William Elliot
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: complete theory of Rationals
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: complete theory of Rationals
- From: m s
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: complete theory of Rationals
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
complete theory of Rationals
- From: m s
Re: Help with a problem
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Rupert
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Rupert
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
Re: question about categoricity
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: MoeBlee
Re: first order model theory question
- From: MoeBlee
Re: first order model theory question
- From: MoeBlee
question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Per Freem
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Per Freem
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: first order model theory question
- From: george
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: george
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: G . Frege
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: "|-" and proofs
- From: William Elliot
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Rupert
"|-" and proofs
- From: paul_bostonjp
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Rupert
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Per Freem
Re: first order model theory question
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: Dan Christensen
first order model theory question
- From: Per Freem
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: Dan Christensen
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Rupert
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Barb Knox
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: smnewberger
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: =
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: ramified type theory
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: smnewberger
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: G . Frege
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: William Elliot
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: G . Frege
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Peter Webb
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: William Elliot
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: MoeBlee
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: William Elliot
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Finest partition - exercise in Suppes's book
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: george
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: =
- From: george
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Helene . Boucher
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Helene . Boucher
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: abo
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: ramified type theory
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: abo
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Rupert
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Rupert
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Rupert
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Barb Knox
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Starbles
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Helene . Boucher
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Helene . Boucher
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- From: abo
Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: george
tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
Penrose vs the Robot
- From: Daryl McCullough
Seminar by Richard Bornat on Separation Logic, 8 December 2005, 6pm, London
- From: FACS FACTS Editor
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
The Power of the Pixel; 5 Years of Advertising at Only a Fraction of the Normal Cost.
- From: walter . alex
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: george
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: From Post to Penrose
- From: george
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: From Post to Penrose
- From: Rupert
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Rupert
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Rupert
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: G . Frege
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: God is a paradox.
- From: georgie
Re: There can be no non-spatial proposition?
- From: Tom
Re: There can be no non-spatial proposition?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Rupert
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: Dan Christensen
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Rupert
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: There can be no non-spatial proposition?
- From: Tom
Re: =
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: God is a paradox.
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: ramified type theory
- From: Owen
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Charlie-Boo
From Post to Penrose
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: There can be no non-spatial proposition?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Rupert
Tautology Elimination in Otter
- From: Paul Sholtz
Re: There can be no non-spatial proposition?
- From: Tom
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: There can be no non-spatial proposition?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: There can be no non-spatial proposition?
- From: Tom
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Rupert
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Rupert
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Rupert
Re: There can be no non-spatial proposition?
- From: Starbles
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
i-C&P CONFERENCE -last call
- From: Colin . Schmidt
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: MoeBlee
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: george
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: george
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: george
Re: =
- From: george
Re: =
- From: george
There can be no non-spatial proposition?
- From: Tom
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Barb Knox
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Barb Knox
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: �a\\/b
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
ramified type theory
- From: Rupert
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: computer
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: G . Frege
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: computer
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
UCLA Logic Colloquium, Nov 18
- From: H. Enderton
Re: The reciprocal of zero isn't even infinity.
- From: Lee Rudolph
Re: Venn Diagram of a Numerical Syllogism?
- From: raydpratt
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: The reciprocal of zero isn't even infinity.
- From: Starbles
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: The reciprocal of zero isn't even infinity.
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
The reciprocal of zero isn't even infinity.
- From: Starbles
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Rupert
Re: Godel's theorem is uninteresting?
- From: ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: george
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is uninteresting?
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: LordBeotian
Re: Stone's Theorem
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: george
Re: The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: george
Re: Godel's theorem is uninteresting?
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: God is way beyond logic and reasoning
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
The MetaMathematical Theorem that Almost Was
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: sradhakr
Godel's theorem is uninteresting?
- From: ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: Dan Christensen
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: LordBeotian
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: LordBeotian
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: LordBeotian
Re: Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: Torkel Franzen
Godel's theorem is invalid?
- From: LordBeotian
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Natural deduction?
- From: G . Frege
Re: Proof theoretical strength of induction up to epsilon-0
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Natural deduction?
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: proving transfinite induction in PA
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Proof theoretical strength of induction up to epsilon-0
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: logic on the web
- From: MoeBlee
Re: =
- From: george
Re: Intro book on Set Theory.
- From: Dan Christensen
proving transfinite induction in PA
- From: Rupert
Proof theoretical strength of induction up to epsilon-0
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Intro book on Set Theory.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Intro book on Set Theory.
- From: RoxPureblood
2nd SIPTA School on Imprecise Probabilities
- From: Enrique Miranda
Conference with specialist on Russell (d. VERNANT) -last call
- From: Colin . Schmidt
i-C&P "Computers + Philosophy" int'l conference -LAST CALL (1000+150 wds.)
- From: Colin . Schmidt
Re: God is way beyond logic and reasoning
- From: William Elliot
God is way beyond logic and reasoning
- From: sam_icon
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: =
- From: george
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: =
- From: Owen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Keith Ramsay
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: JEFFREY KETLAND
Re: ring/field/algebra
- From: Arturo Magidin
Re: ring/field/algebra
- From: george
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Poem on halting problem
- From: Poldie
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Venn Diagram of a Numerical Syllogism?
- From: Poldie
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: =
- From: george
Re: =
- From: george
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: =
- From: H. Enderton
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: =
- From: Owen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Question on upwards LST
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Question on upwards LST
- From: Robert Low
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: nonstandard models of PA
- From: Alex R
Re: Question on upwards LST
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Question on upwards LST
- From: Robert Low
Re: Question on upwards LST
- From: poopdeville
Re: =
- From: george
Re: =
- From: Owen
Re: =
- From: H. Enderton
Re: =
- From: Owen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Stephen Harris
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: God is a paradox.
- From: |-|erc
Re: God is a paradox.
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: nonstandard models of PA
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: God is a paradox.
- From: Rupert
nonstandard models of PA
- From: Bill Taylor
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: =
- From: H. Enderton
Re: nonstandard models of PA
- From: H. Enderton
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: nonstandard models of PA
- From: William Elliot
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: abo
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Torkel Franzen
Venn Diagram of a Numerical Syllogism?
- From: raydpratt
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Daryl McCullough
God is a paradox.
- From: Starbles
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: george
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
Re: Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert
[FAQ, 99/07/28] Mathematical logic on the web
- From: Boris 'pi' Piwinger
Penrose's reply to Chalmers
- From: Rupert