Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:55:25 +0100
On 20 Nov 2005 17:08:01 -0800, "george" <greeneg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote
someting.
Look, george, I'm not going to argue with you (any more).
But it might be illuminating for you to compare Church's account with
the account given here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic
F.
--
"I do tend to feel Hughes & Cresswell is a more authoritative
source than you." (D. Ullrich)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
- Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- References:
- tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
- Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
- Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
- Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: G . Frege
- Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- From: george
- tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- Prev by Date: Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- Next by Date: Re: What is the 1st order formal system known as PA?
- Previous by thread: Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- Next by thread: Re: tedious sledding re set existence in FOL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|