Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 24 Nov 2005 15:05:33 -0800
Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
> Starbles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Actually the universe is consistent and complete. It exists. That has
> > been proven with informal logic.
>
> Given that the universe is not a formal theory what does it mean to say
> it's "consistent and complete"?
>
There are no contradictions in the universe. That is true. It is also
true that everything that exists exists in the universe. The former is
proof that it is consistent, and the latter is proof that it is
complete.
> --
> Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
>
> "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
> - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- References:
- Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
- Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Starbles
- Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Informal theories versus formal theories.
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with a problem
- Next by Date: Re: Help with a problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- Next by thread: Re: Informal theories versus formal theories.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|