Re: Help with a problem
- From: "George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2005 04:18:53 -0800
G. Frege wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2005 03:56:31 -0800, "George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > [...] The first logic text I studied PC
> > in (Woods, Irvine & Walton's /Argument/) used a system (called by the
> > authors P) that was essentially the same as the Copi one I found on the
> > web (though with 22 inference rules) and the same names; so these have
> > stuck with me.
> >
>
> Remindes me of the famous quote:
>
> "It is practically impossible to teach good programming style
> to students that have had prior exposure to BASIC: as potential
> programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of
> regeneration."
> (Edsger Dijkstra)
>
Whether that analogy applies depends on what you think makes a system
of natural deduction good, IOW what one wants to achieve with one..
If one's aim is to use nd to formalize the inferences of informal
reasoning, then a system like Copi's would work best. If OTOH (as per
your analogy) one's aim is to train people to reason in a certain
'style' only, then a system like Gentzen's would clearly be better. .
> F.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- References:
- Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
- Help with a problem
- Prev by Date: Re: "|-" and proofs
- Next by Date: Re: Natural deduction?
- Previous by thread: Re: Help with a problem
- Next by thread: Re: Help with a problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|