Re: Help with a problem
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:52:07 +0100
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:42:53 -0800, William Elliot
<marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rules of the Hypothetical Syllogism
1) To posit the antecedent is to posit the consequent
2) to sublate the consequent is to sublate the antecedent
(Michael J. Mahony, Essentials of Formal Logic)
In modern language:
Assume a conditional holds.
1) If its antecedent holds, then its consequent holds
2) if the negation of its consequent holds, then the
negation of its antecedent holds.
(due to J. E. Lemmon, Beginning Logic)
F.
--
"I do tend to feel Hughes & Cresswell is a more authoritative
source than you." (D. Ullrich)
.
- References:
- Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
- Help with a problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with a problem
- Next by Date: Re: Penrose vs the Robot
- Previous by thread: Re: Help with a problem
- Next by thread: Re: Help with a problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|