Re: Help with a problem
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:20:05 +0100
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:24:01 GMT, Robert Zimmerman <rfz1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> Thank you so much. It is truly appreciated. I'm moving on into the next
> chapters, and don't anticipate any more torment, for me or for the
> group. However, I'd be grateful if people had suggestions for one who
> would like to learn logic in a little more depth. I do suppose that to
> you guys that's sort of the equivalent to somebody asking me for more
> reading in medicine: I would say, "Orthopedics, infectious disease,
> nephrology, what exactly do you mean?" But perhaps there is sort of
> standard progression for neophytes?
>
Uhhh... (a problem where formal logic c a n ' t help... ;-)
It's hard for me to give a recommendation. You might consider Lemmon's
'Beginning Logic' next. (Very good introduction to natural deduction -
the real stuff.) Or even _the latest edition_ (!) of Copi's 'Symbolic
Logic'. ("Introduction to Logic" is rather superficial compared with
'Symbolic Logic'.)
F.
--
"I do tend to feel Hughes & Cresswell is a more authoritative
source than you." (D. Ullrich)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
- Re: Help with a problem
- References:
- Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
- Help with a problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
- Next by Date: Re: question about categoricity
- Previous by thread: Re: Help with a problem
- Next by thread: Re: Help with a problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|