Re: Help with a problem
- From: "George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Nov 2005 12:12:20 -0800
Torkel Franzen wrote:
> "George Dance" <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Not at all, since (1) and (2) are both examples of RAA proofs and
> > therefore of indirect proofs. I do think there is no logical
> > difference between one RAA proof and another.
>
> Yes, you already said that. You are of course free to embrace
> ignorance.
Umm, yass; that's what the Jehovah's Witnesses told me, too. 8)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- References:
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Robert Zimmerman
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: George Dance
- Re: Help with a problem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help with a problem
- Prev by Date: Re: question about categoricity
- Next by Date: Re: Help with a problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Help with a problem
- Next by thread: Re: Help with a problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|