Re: question about categoricity
- From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Nov 2005 21:36:55 +0100
"Per Freem" <perfreem@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> but since Chris's example involves expanding the language of the first
> structure (by adding another constant to it), [...]
There was no added constant, just an added element in the domain.
Quoting his response: " Suppose B's domain is Nat U {you} and 'd_i'
denotes i in B, for all i, and nothing denotes you in B."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
- Re: question about categoricity
- References:
- question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
- Re: question about categoricity
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
- Re: question about categoricity
- From: george
- Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
- Re: question about categoricity
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
- Re: question about categoricity
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: question about categoricity
- From: Per Freem
- question about categoricity
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with a problem
- Next by Date: Re: Help with a problem
- Previous by thread: Re: question about categoricity
- Next by thread: Re: question about categoricity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|