Re: Evaluation of article
- From: "Tron" <tronfuru@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:38:19 +0100
Hi,
Thank you. Way above and beyond. Much appreciated.
"Charlie-Boo" <chvol@xxxxxxx> skrev i melding
news:1134639163.419984.133780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tron wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry, it is a Goedel again.
>> I just wondered if any of you cognoscenti would be so kind as to cast a
>> quick glance at
>>
>> http://www.columbia.edu/~hg17/Diagonal-Cantor-Goedel-05.pdf
>>
>> and see/say if the presentation of Goedel here is within the non-kooky
>> mainstream of accepted readings of G. ? I.e. not a waste of time?
>
> This new Gaifman paper, "The Easy Way to Godel's Proof and Related
> Matters", has nothing new that I could see.
Lots of new stuff to me, though.
My main interest is that he works up to less and less formalized systems.
Thanks again.
T
.
- References:
- Evaluation of article
- From: Tron
- Re: Evaluation of article
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Evaluation of article
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- Next by Date: Re: Evaluation of article
- Previous by thread: Re: Evaluation of article
- Next by thread: What do we call ...?
- Index(es):