Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: stevendaryl3016@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
- Date: 16 Dec 2005 03:43:45 -0800
Torkel Franzen says...
>"Rupert" <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> plus Daryl's version of GCH
>> (namely, "If X is infinte, |X|<|Y|, and P(X) exists, then |P(X)|<=|Y|"
>> - is that the one you meant?)
>
>No, Daryl's version was
>
> Forall sets X, P
> if every element of P is a subset of X,
> then forall sets Y,
> either there is a surjection from X to Y,
> or there is a surjection from Y to P
Actually, I made both suggestions. I like the second one better.
--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY
.
- References:
- Question on the power set axiom
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Rupert
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Rupert
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Rupert
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Rupert
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Rupert
- Re: Question on the power set axiom
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Question on the power set axiom
- Prev by Date: Re: Question on the power set axiom
- Next by Date: Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Question on the power set axiom
- Next by thread: Re: Question on the power set axiom
- Index(es):