Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem

From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Dec 2005 09:46:15 +0100

"Charlie-Boo" <chvol@xxxxxxx> writes:

> What do you disagree with in the above?

You mistakenly take the argument to be about classical propositional
logic.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Charlie-Boo

References:
- Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Dan Christensen
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Barb Knox
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: sradhakr
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Barb Knox
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: sradhakr
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: G . Frege
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
  - From: Charlie-Boo

Prev by Date: Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
Next by Date: Re: Evaluation of article
Previous by thread: Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
Next by thread: Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread