Inductive and deductive practices
- From: "Lupus" <ihowllikeawolf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Dec 2005 08:26:12 -0800
If the problem of induction is that we can't articulate a justification
of our inductive practices that doesn't presuppose the validity of
those practises, isn't there a parallel problem for deduction? i.e. we
must presuppose the validity of deductive inferences in order to
justify them, if we even bother to justify them at all.
So either you give them a circular justification or no justification.
Either way their validity is presupposed.
Isn't that something of a problem? And if it isn't, then why is it a
problem for induction?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inductive and deductive practices
- From: Michael De
- Re: Inductive and deductive practices
- From: Tron
- Re: Inductive and deductive practices
- Prev by Date: Re: The formal and informal proofs
- Next by Date: Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- Previous by thread: The formal and informal proofs
- Next by thread: Re: Inductive and deductive practices
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|