Re: The formal and informal proofs
- From: "Charlie-Boo" <chvol@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Dec 2005 12:21:06 -0800
Torkel Franzen wrote:
> "Charlie-Boo" <chvol@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I soon realized that ZF and all of its variations (all feeble attempts
> > to correct Russell's Paradox) were monumental mistakes.
>
> Excellent! You are on your way to true insight. But don't stop there.
I fail to see any mathematical content in your response.
C-B
You know, it's funny. I have so much to say that I have to hold back,
occasionally letting loose and posting a page or two of ideas and
results. How can you resist saying something intelligent?
.
- References:
- The formal and informal proofs
- From: T.B.
- Re: The formal and informal proofs
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: The formal and informal proofs
- From: T.B.
- Re: The formal and informal proofs
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: The formal and informal proofs
- From: Torkel Franzen
- The formal and informal proofs
- Prev by Date: Re: ZFC means?
- Next by Date: Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- Previous by thread: Re: The formal and informal proofs
- Next by thread: Re: The formal and informal proofs
- Index(es):