Re: decidability and completeness
- From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Dec 2005 13:13:14 +0100
"Per Freem" <perfreem@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> is it possible to have a language that can express theories that are
> not 1st order representable--meaning there's no 1st order logic theory
> such that it has exactly the same models as the theory--and still have
> the language be decidable?
What do you mean by a decidable language?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: decidability and completeness
- From: Per Freem
- Re: decidability and completeness
- References:
- decidability and completeness
- From: Per Freem
- decidability and completeness
- Prev by Date: using encoder as MUX
- Next by Date: Re: decidability and completeness
- Previous by thread: decidability and completeness
- Next by thread: Re: decidability and completeness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|