Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- From: stevendaryl3016@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
- Date: 29 Dec 2005 14:24:23 -0800
Charlie-Boo says...
>Change "you are not interested in" to "there's nothing gained in the
>final analysis", then the answer is: It shows that Frege is wasting his
>time since nobody has ever come up with a wff that he produces that
>case analysis does not.
Propositional intuitionistic logic is a *refinement* of case
analysis. It's not supposed to prove more wffs, it is supposed
to prove *fewer* wffs, and it succeeds.
--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY
.
- References:
- Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- Prev by Date: Re: ZFC means?
- Next by Date: decidability results for relational logic
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- Next by thread: Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
- Index(es):