Re: CH yet again.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 12:49:35 +0200
MoeBlee wrote:
Bill Taylor wrote:
Would you say what the two non-equivalent formulas are?Now and again I propose the PoV that CH is both true and false, depending on how it is worded, there being two non-equivalent ways for this in ZF without choice.
The formulations "c = aleph_1" and "every infinite set of reals is either countable or has the cardinality of the continuum" are not equivalent without choice. The first of these obviously implies the second, but for the other direction you need choice. I don't know whether this is what Bill had in mind.
-- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CH yet again.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: CH yet again.
- References:
- Re: CH yet again.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: CH yet again.
- Prev by Date: Re: ZFC means?
- Next by Date: Re: Kripke's inductive partial self-applicable truth predicate
- Previous by thread: Re: CH yet again.
- Next by thread: Re: CH yet again.
- Index(es):