Re: CH yet again.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:10:56 +0200
MoeBlee wrote:
Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
The formulations "c = aleph_1" and "every infinite set of reals is either countable or has the cardinality of the continuum" are not equivalent without choice. The first of these obviously implies the second, but for the other direction you need choice. I don't know whether this is what Bill had in mind.
Thanks, Aatu. I understand how the first implies the second. But can you give a synopsis of how the axiom of choice is used to prove that the second implies the first, or is the proof too complicated to synopsize in a paragraph?
The usual proof goes like this: by choice the cardinality of the continuum is an aleph, and if there is no cardinality between aleph_0 and the cardinality of the continuum, then the cardinality of the continuum is aleph_1 (since it is greater than aleph_0 by Cantor's theorem). Without choice, the cardinality of the continuum need not be an aleph, and this argument breaks down.
-- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CH yet again.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: CH yet again.
- References:
- Re: CH yet again.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: CH yet again.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: CH yet again.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: CH yet again.
- Prev by Date: Re: CH yet again.
- Next by Date: Re: There is no language of arithmetic
- Previous by thread: Re: CH yet again.
- Next by thread: Re: CH yet again.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|