Re: incompleteness of first-order logic
- From: Jan Burse <janburse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:06:39 +0100
Li Yi wrote:
T is Complete, if for any sentence p, it holds T |/- p => T |- not p.
How to prove it in propositional logic?
In propositional logic, you have Th M |= A iff A element of Th M.
Could you please show a concrete example to Th M |/= forall y R(c,y) Th M |/= exists y not R(c,y). The book written by my teacher says it is true in first-order logic.
Maybe a badly written book, or I was too quick.
I think M must be at least countably infinite, otherwise Th M is again complete.
Example comming soon.
Bye
.
- References:
- incompleteness of first-order logic
- From: Li Yi
- Re: incompleteness of first-order logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: incompleteness of first-order logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: incompleteness of first-order logic
- From: Li Yi
- incompleteness of first-order logic
- Prev by Date: Re: incompleteness of first-order logic
- Previous by thread: Re: incompleteness of first-order logic
- Next by thread: Re: incompleteness of first-order logic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading