Re: Axioms for the real numbers
- From: Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:41:46 GMT
un student wrote:
The completeness axiom, which states that every sequence bounded above has a l.u.b. (least upper bound), below a g.l.b. (greatest lower bound).
How come real numbers are uncountable? Which part of axioms "brings in"
the fact that reals are uncountable? I just can't understand where it
comes from.... and yes, I have studied different definitions of reals
but still can't get it.
What this axioms says, in relation to your question, the (countable) set
of rational numbers is not "dense" enough to reflect the continuity of
the real numbers. To reflect that we need a more "dense" set of numbers,
such as the power set of rational numbers - which is uncountable. The
completeness axiom is just a formalization of this need. Imho.
---Nam
TIA
--
----------------------------------------------------
Time passes, there is no way we can hold it back.
Why then do thoughts linger, long after everything
else is gone?
Ryokan
----------------------------------------------------
.
- References:
- Re: Axioms for the real numbers
- From: un student
- Re: Axioms for the real numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Axioms for the real numbers
- Next by Date: Re: Equivalence Laws between logic and arithmetic
- Previous by thread: Re: Axioms for the real numbers
- Next by thread: Re: Axioms for the real numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|