sci.logic

Thread Index

Re: Possible world semantics
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Possible world semantics
- From: Paul Holbach
Re: Possible world semantics
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Possible world semantics
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Possible world semantics
- From: Sundar
Re: FOL theories and models - A "peculiar" situation
- From: Bertie Reed
Re: Possible world semantics
- From: Frederick Williams
Possible world semantics
- From: Sundar
Re: Goldbach Conjecture - A metaphor
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: george
Re: Goldbach Conjecture - A metaphor
- From: george
FOL theories and models - A "peculiar" situation
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Goldbach Conjecture - A metaphor
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Goldbach Conjecture - A metaphor
- From: george
Re: Goldbach Conjecture - A metaphor
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: recursively enumerable sets
- From: waveletter
Re: Game Outcome
- From: tjb
Re: recursively enumerable sets
- From: waveletter
Re: every semidecidable set contains decidable subset?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: every semidecidable set contains decidable subset?
- From: george
Re: every semidecidable set contains decidable subset?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: recursively enumerable sets
- From: waveletter
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: waveletter
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: waveletter
every semidecidable set contains decidable subset?
- From: Per Freem
independent axiomatization
- From: Li Yi
Game Outcome
- From: tjb
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: Henrik
Re: Goldbach Conjecture - A metaphor
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: recursively enumerable sets
- From: Per Freem
Re: Maximal/ly
- From: Frederick Williams
Goldbach Conjecture - A metaphor
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: george
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: george
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: Henrik
Re: Universal Programming Lanaguage
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Maximal/ly
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Maximal/ly
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Maximal/ly
- From: William Elliot
Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic - formulation?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic - formulation?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Three door problem
- From: Arturo Magidin
Three door problem
- From: peterlavington
Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic - formulation?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic - formulation?
- From: MoeBlee
Maximal/ly
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Universal Programming Lanaguage
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: Universal Programming Lanaguage
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Universal Programming Lanaguage
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Universal Programming Lanaguage
- From: edward . meinert
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: george
Re: recursively enumerable sets
- From: waveletter
Re: Z set theory - predicative or impredicative?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Z set theory - predicative or impredicative?
- From: R. Srinivasan
Re: Z set theory - predicative or impredicative?
- From: Bill Taylor
Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic - formulation?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: juanpool@xxxxxxxxx
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: waveletter
Primitive Recursive Arithmetic - formulation?
- From: MoeBlee
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: george
Re: Harvey Friedman on Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: george
Re: Z set theory - predicative or impredicative?
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: zakvald
Re: Z set theory - predicative or impredicative?
- From: MoeBlee
recursively enumerable sets
- From: Per Freem
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: juanpool@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: zakvald
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: juanpool@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Michael De
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: waveletter
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: george
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: george
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: waveletter
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: Rupert
Re: I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: juanpool@xxxxxxxxx
Re: problem
- From: davide
Re: Henderton or Mendelson
- From: Chris Menzel
I have a question about Godel's proof ...
- From: juanpool@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Henderton or Mendelson
- From: ali_tofigh
Re: Henderton or Mendelson
- From: ali_tofigh
Re: George Berkeley opposing material substances
- From: Barb Knox
Re: George Berkeley opposing material substances
- From: Tron
Re: George Berkeley opposing material substances
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: Henrik
Psychological Test on Personal Orientation
- From: ggroups
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: Kilgore Trout
Re: Lemmon-style natural deduction and modal logic
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: george
Re: George Berkeley opposing material substances
- From: Tron
Re: George Berkeley opposing material substances
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: George Berkeley opposing material substances
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Henderton or Mendelson
- From: smnewberger
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: waveletter
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: waveletter
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: William Elliot
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: waveletter
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: waveletter
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: zakvald
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: gggggggggg
- From: Tim
gggggggggg
- From: yusufislam123
gggggggggg
- From: yusufislam123
CFP: LCC'06 - Workshop on Logic and Computational Complexity
- From: Jim Royer
Re: George Berkeley opposing material substances
- From: Tron
Re: George Berkeley opposing material substances
- From: Mandie
George Berkeley opposing material substances
- From: mandiemohsenzadegan
Re: Henderton or Mendelson
- From: Frederick Williams
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: William Elliot
Re: Henderton or Mendelson
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: waveletter
Henderton or Mendelson
- From: ali_tofigh
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Goedel incompl. theorems
- From: zakvald
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Barb Knox
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Lemmon-style natural deduction and modal logic
- From: Antonio Martini
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Charlie-Boo
Church's Thesis and Generalized Church's Thesis
- From: Peter_Smith
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Logic - Open Access Publications
- From: Giandomenico Sica
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Michael De
Re: Axioms for the real numbers
- From: G . Frege
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- From: george
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: A Definition of an Algorithm
- From: noson
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
Re: problem
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Bertie Reed
problem
- From: davide
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Duals of Smullyan trees
- From: Michael De
Re: Duals of Smullyan trees
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Michael De
Duals of Smullyan trees
- From: Michael De
Re: Defining Tautologies
- From: Tom Adams
Re: A Definition of an Algorithm and its relation to Hilbert's 10th
- From: george
Re: Defining Tautologies
- From: Tom Adams
Re: Defining Tautologies
- From: waveletter
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: R. Srinivasan
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Nam Nguyen
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: R. Srinivasan
Re: Defining Tautologies
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Defining Tautologies
- From: smnewberger
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: george
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Arithmetical statements that apply to cryptography and are undecidable in PA
- From: Giovanni Lagnese
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: R. Srinivasan
Re: Google weirdness
- From: William Elliot
Re: Google weirdness
- From: Ken Pledger
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: george
Google weirdness
- From: Ken Quirici
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: R. Srinivasan
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Nam Nguyen
How to use the rules of the Socratic Method in our search for truth
- From: romain . angeles
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: A historical question concerning the "Nicod Stroke"
- From: G . Frege
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Defining Tautologies
- From: Tom
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: A historical question concerning the "Nicod Stroke"
- From: Daniel M. Ryan
Re: A historical question concerning the "Nicod Stroke"
- From: Daniel M. Ryan
Re: A historical question concerning the "Nicod Stroke"
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: A historical question concerning the "Nicod Stroke"
- From: William Elliot
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
A historical question concerning the "Nicod Stroke"
- From: Daniel M. Ryan
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Defining Tautologies
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Protoman
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Jeffrey Ketland
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Protoman
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Protoman
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Defining Tautologies
- From: Tom
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Protoman
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Jeffrey Ketland
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Owen
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Owen
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Protoman
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Roberto Vescarelli
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: William Elliot
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: Protoman
Re: Wierd Truth Table
- From: William Elliot
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Wierd Truth Table
- From: Protoman
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
Further Reduction of the General Incompleteness Principle
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: IPP - proof and question
- From: ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Jan Burse
IPP - proof and question
- From: ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Michael De
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Keith Ramsay
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: All Metamathematical Incompleteness (Godel, Rosser, Smullyan) in one simple Proof - Amazing!
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: All Metamathematical Incompleteness (Godel, Rosser, Smullyan) in one simple Proof - Amazing!
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: All Metamathematical Incompleteness (Godel, Rosser, Smullyan) in one simple Proof - Amazing!
- From: Colin
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Michael De
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Comparing Proofs of Rosser's 1936 Theorem
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Skolemization and quantifier dependencies
- From: Michael De
Re: Proving induction
- From: Charlie-Boo
(t-table and t-trees) vs. ND
- From: studylogic06
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Corresponding Material Conditionals
- From: studylogic06
Re: Corresponding Material Conditionals
- From: studylogic06
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Charlie-Boo
All Metamathematical Incompleteness (Godel, Rosser, Smullyan) in one simple Proof - Amazing!
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: natural deduction
- From: Manuel Bremer
Re: natural deduction
- From: Chris Menzel
natural deduction
- From: fooby
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Bertie Reed
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
Re: Corresponding Material Conditionals
- From: G . Frege
Corresponding Material Conditionals
- From: studylogic06
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: William Elliot
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Michael De
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Jan Burse
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Daryl McCullough
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Chris Menzel
Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Manuel Bremer
Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: David C . Ullrich
Re: truth/falsity of sentences in first-order logic
- From: David C . Ullrich
[FAQ, 99/07/28] Mathematical logic on the web
- From: Boris 'pi' Piwinger