Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: "Charlie-Boo" <shymathguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Mar 2006 13:14:22 -0800
Daryl McCullough wrote:
Charlie-Boo says...
Let w be any true sentence and v be any provable sentence. Now |-v
since v is provable, and |-(w^v) since w^v is logically equivalent to v
since w is true.
Two statements A and B are *logically* equivalent only if the statement
A <-> B
is provable. So w^v is not logically equivalent to v unless
w^v <-> v
is provable.
Whatever! So do you agree that w^v is true iff v is true? Then what
do you call that? Anyway, the same reasoning applies. If |-P then
|-~~P and if |-P then |-P^P etc. Get it? So if two wffs have the same
truth value, then they obviously would have the same provability. Why
not?
C-B
--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Rupert
- Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- References:
- Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- Prev by Date: Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- Next by Date: Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- Previous by thread: Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- Next by thread: Re: Sorry Godel - All Truths are Provable
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading