Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse <janburse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:32:37 +0200
Hi
David C. Ullrich wrote:
First, and more to the point: _If_ we do that
we arrive at a situation where the statement
I made that you disputed is obviously correct:
Say P and Q are unary predicates. Let alpha be
P -> P and let beta be Q -> Q. Then alpha |- beta, although there does not exist
a gamma including only sentence symbols common
to alpha and beta.
Why don't you like my gamme=false, or
alternatively gamme=true. That I suggested
in my initial post?
True and false are not 0-ary predicate symbols
or propositional variables. They are 0-ary
connectives with the following truth values:
true false
---- -----
1 0
Ok, if you use a logic without any of these
two connectives you have to use p v ~p for
true. But this is only a slight relativation
of the interpolation theorem, which I think
assumes true and/or false in the logical language.
Bye
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- References:
- interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- From: Li Yi
- Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- From: David C . Ullrich
- interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- Prev by Date: Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- Next by Date: Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- Previous by thread: Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- Next by thread: Re: interpolation theorem of propositional logic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|