Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Patricia Shanahan <pats@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 02:19:20 GMT
Scott wrote:
Patricia:
I'm having trouble reading your notation. Could you give some examples?
What does each of the first few natural numbers each map to?
A function that maps N to 2^S, where P(S). Examples:
0 -> 00000000000000... = empty set
1 -> 10101010101010... = {0, 2, 4, 6, ...} = even numbers
2 -> 00000100000000... = {5}
3-> 01110101000101... = {1,2,3,5,7,11,13,...} = primes
...
Technically, I guess, there are an infinite number of such functions
depending upon the order of enumerating the powerset.
If I believed there were any order of enumerating the set of all strings
over {0,1} that includes all strings, finite and infinite, I would also
believe that N and P(N) have the same cardinality.
Can you prove the existence of even one such enumeration, let alone the
infinity you claim? Can you tell me a rule for finding where an
arbitrary string appears in your enumeration?
Of course, no matter what rule you tell me, I'll construct the string that differs in bit n from string n in your enumeration.
Patricia
.
- References:
- Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: george
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Scott
- Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Next by Date: Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Next by thread: Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|