sci.logic

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: georgie
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Vagueness Again
  • From: tjb
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Third new law from the premises of syllogism
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Third new law from the premises of syllogism
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Barb Knox
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Fourth new law from the premises of syllogism
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Third new law from the premises of syllogism
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Integer Part (Floor) of Complex Number is A Real Number !!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Jan Burse
• Fourth new law from the premises of syllogism
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Third new law from the premises of syllogism
  • From: Conbra
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Is this right? (New model from old...)
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Vagueness Again
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Is this right? (New model from old...)
  • From: Jeffrey Ketland
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: georgie
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Integer Part (Floor) of Complex Number is A Real Number !!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: Mohamed Al-Dabbagh
• Re: Is this right? (New model from old...)
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Vagueness Again
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Vagueness Again
  • From: tjb
• Re: Vagueness Again
  • From: tjb
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: tjb
• Re: Vagueness Again
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: tjb
• Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Vagueness Again
  • From: tjb
• Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: tjb
• Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE
  • From: abo
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Li Yi
• Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Q: Constants and variables in models
  • From: un student
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Third new law from the premises of syllogism
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Grammar based on lambda calculus
  • From: ernobe
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Third new law from the premises of syllogism
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE
  • From: abo
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: tjb
• Re: Vagueness Again
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Closing the antecedent
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Closing the antecedent
  • From: John Jones
• Is this right? (New model from old...)
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST STRONG AI. A CHALLENGE
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Closing the antecedent
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Closing the antecedent
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: Vagueness Again
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Integer Part (Floor) of Complex Number is A Real Number !!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Discussion Relationship among Concept Algebra, Set Algebra and Logic Algebra
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Closing the antecedent
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Li Yi
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Li Yi
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Closing the antecedent
  • From: John Jones
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: george
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: george
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: tjb
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: tjb
• Vagueness Again
  • From: tjb
• Integer Part (Floor) of Complex Number is A Real Number !!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: Mohamed Al-Dabbagh
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Discussion Relationship among Concept Algebra, Set Algebra and Logic Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: Peter Webb
• Re: Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Vague or Ambiguous?
  • From: tjb
• Re: Discussion Relationship among Concept Algebra, Set Algebra and Logic Algebra
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Discussion Relationship among Concept Algebra, Set Algebra and Logic Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Discussion Relationship among Concept Algebra, Set Algebra and Logic Algebra
  • From: William Elliot
• Discussion Relationship among Concept Algebra, Set Algebra and Logic Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Li Yi
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Barb Knox
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patrick
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: george
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: Li Yi
• Re: I need help understanding an example in Marker
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Russell Easterly
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: FO logic without equality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: I need help understanding an example in Marker
  • From: Achim Blumensath
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why?
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why?
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Barb Knox
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: How do you set this thing?
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Can you please answer this?
  • From: Newberry
• FO logic without equality
  • From: Li Yi
• Discussion of the Operations on Concept Algebra, Set Algebra and Logic Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Validity in domains of a fixed cardinality
  • From: Pietro
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why?
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why?
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why?
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why?
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Validity in domains of a fixed cardinality
  • From: Michael De
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Validity in domains of a fixed cardinality
  • From: Michael De
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• I need help understanding an example in Marker
  • From: blakman211
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Validity in domains of a fixed cardinality
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Validity in domains of a fixed cardinality
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Discussion of first new law from the premises of syllogism
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Validity in domains of a fixed cardinality
  • From: Pietro
• Re: Can you please answer this?
  • From: SAMVIT
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Can you please answer this?
  • From: rtonyreeder
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Validity in domains of a fixed cardinality
  • From: mordov
• Can you please answer this?
  • From: samvit . iit . kgp
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: Why?
  • From: abo
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: How do you set this thing?
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why?
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why?
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• How do you set this thing?
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Pietro
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• omega consistency
  • From: kjd_72
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: george
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why?
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• CFPart: DEON 2006, Eighth International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science
  • From: Jan Broersen
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Li Yi
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patrick
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why?
  • From: stevendaryl3016
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why?
  • From: MoeBlee
• transitive closure
  • From: Li Yi
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why?
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Primitive Recursive Functions, References?
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why?
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Model Complete Theories
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why?
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Why?
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patrick
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: omega-saturated models in Model Theory
  • From: blakman211
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: an FO problem
  • From: Pietro
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Model Complete Theories
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: NF's Universal Set
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: omega-saturated models in Model Theory
  • From: Bertie Reed
• NF's Universal Set
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Chris Menzel
• an FO problem
  • From: Li Yi
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: A Priori Science
  • From: Justin Roche
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Newberry
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: A Priori Science
  • From: Newberry
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Paul Holbach
• A Priori Science
  • From: Justin Roche
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Model Complete Theories
  • From: blakman211
• Re: omega-saturated models in Model Theory
  • From: blakman211
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: omega-saturated models in Model Theory
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Simple predicate calculus proof
  • From: Toni Lassila
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• The Real Bible Code. The Key is established and checked
  • From: borisg1
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patrick
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Model Complete Theories
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Back and Forth Method
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Model Complete Theories
  • From: blakman211
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Back and Forth Method
  • From: blakman211
• omega-saturated models in Model Theory
  • From: blakman211
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Ordinal notations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Ordinal notations
  • From: Bill Taylor
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Simple predicate calculus proof
  • From: Owen
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patrick
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Simple predicate calculus proof
  • From: Roberto Vescarelli
• Re: Simple predicate calculus proof
  • From: Roberto Vescarelli
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Simple predicate calculus proof
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Simple predicate calculus proof
  • From: toni . lassila
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: apoorv
• THE PROTON RADIUS 28.5 FERMI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Concept Algebra is the base of logic thinking
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: help with proving union of converse relations
  • From: MoeBlee
• help with proving union of converse relations
  • From: isaac2004
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Primitive Recursive Functions, References?
  • From: RexButler
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: WANT TO MAKE $50,000.00 in 5 weeks
  • From: Einstein
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Primitive Recursive Functions, References?
  • From: george
• Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic and Computable Categories
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: bargiax
• Some comments on Mathematical Objects and Mathematical Truth
  • From: Bhupinder Singh Anand
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Your opinions
  • From: Rupert
• Your opinions
  • From: bargiax
• setting model for tendency analysis
  • From: fxfocc
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Back and Forth Method
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic and Computable Categories
  • From: RexButler
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Back and Forth Method
  • From: blakman211
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: georgie
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: georgie
• Re: Back and Forth Method
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Back and Forth Method
  • From: blakman211
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Back and Forth Method
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Anders Goeransson
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: abo
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Liar's Paradox in Godel's Theorem (newbie question)
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Back and Forth Method
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: georgie
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Back and Forth Method
  • From: blakman211
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Bertie Reed
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Liar's Paradox in Godel's Theorem (newbie question)
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic and Computable Categories
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Anders Goeransson
• Re: Where is the paradox in liar?
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Liar's Paradox in Godel's Theorem (newbie question)
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: mordov
• Re: Liar's Paradox in Godel's Theorem (newbie question)
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Gc
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Jan Burse
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Gc
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Gc
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Gc
• Re: "Algorithmic Randomness, Quantum Physics, and Incompleteness"
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Gc
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic and Computable Categories
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Bertie Reed
• The Real Bible Code - Decoding in Real Time
  • From: borisg1
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic and Computable Categories
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Jeff Barnett
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• "Algorithmic Randomness, Quantum Physics, and Incompleteness"
  • From: Stephen Harris
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Per Freem
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Henrik
• Re: proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• proof of undecidability of halting problem
  • From: Per Freem
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patrick
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patrick
• Absolute+relative Truths: The duality of Truths. ©
  • From: caesarjbsquitti
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: abo
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Gc
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: abo
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Gc
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: george
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: george
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: mordov
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: mordov
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: mordov
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: david petry
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: Tom
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: Tom
• Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic and Computable Categories
  • From: RexButler
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: mordov
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: mordov
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic and Computable Categories
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Re: Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Primitive Recursive Arithmetic and Computable Categories
  • From: RexButler
• Re: Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: Tom
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Theories and (denumerable) models
  • From: mordov
• Re: Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Re: Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Re: Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: William Elliot
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Deductions vs. Theorems
  • From: Tom
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: george
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Cantor's theorem:
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: William of Ockham
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: erland
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Cantor's theorem:
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patrick
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Patrick
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Cantor's theorem:
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?
  • From: Gc
• An Existence Theorem
  • From: symphony
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: 1-1 recursive functions and sets
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Owen
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Lindenbaum's lemma
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Lindenbaum's lemma
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Owen
• Re: 1-1 recursive functions and sets
  • From: Per Freem
• Re: 1-1 recursive functions and sets
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patrick
• 1-1 recursive functions and sets
  • From: Per Freem
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Torkel Franzén is dead
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Barb Knox
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Can this theory T exist?
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Can this theory T exist?
  • From: Pietro
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Patricia Shanahan
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: george
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Plural Definite Descriptions
  • From: Paul Holbach
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Arturo Magidin
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
  • From: Scott
• Re: Can this theory T exist?
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Liar's Paradox in Godel's Theorem (newbie question)
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Axiomatizations of set theory
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Axiomatizations of set theory
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: Lindenbaum's lemma
  • From: mordov
• Re: set theories
  • From: Chris Menzel
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Need help to answer a boy genius.
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: set theories
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: set theories
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Can this theory T exist?
  • From: Nam Nguyen
• Re: set theories
  • From: Charlie-Boo