Re: Liar's Paradox in Godel's Theorem (newbie question)
- From: "Charlie-Boo" <shymathguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2006 15:07:23 -0700
Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
What does Godel's Theorem (first and second)
has to say about Liar's Paradox?
Nothing, really.
Nothing?
So what exactly do you think the incompleteness theorems tell us about
the liar paradox? That it's not about provability?
No, that "This is not provable." is not equivalent to "This is not
true.", so that truth does not coincide with provability.
Do you see how to derive Godel's Theorem based on soundness given that
truth and provability do not coincide?
C-B
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Liar's Paradox in Godel's Theorem (newbie question)
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Liar's Paradox in Godel's Theorem (newbie question)
- Prev by Date: Re: A problem in first order logic
- Next by Date: Re: Where is the paradox in liar?
- Previous by thread: Re: A problem in first order logic
- Next by thread: Re: Liar's Paradox in Godel's Theorem (newbie question)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|