Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: "Scott" <ToaTerra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 May 2006 14:13:03 -0700
George:
holds for any set). No list of n items can contain 2^n
elements. 2^n IS BIGGER than n. You will ALWAYS
be able to diagonalize. N does not even need to be
infinite for this proof to work.
Incorrect again, dumbass. infinity = infinity + 1 = 2^infinity.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: george
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: george
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- From: george
- Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Next by Date: Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Next by thread: Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
- Index(es):